#Best code review tools for github software#
#Best code review tools for github professional#

#Best code review tools for github professional#

Information sharing and professional developmentД¬ode reviews are an opportunity for more people to understand forthcoming code changes, so that they might in turn teach others down the road, and be in a position to fix something if/when the original author is not be available.ДЄdditionally, code reviews are an opportunity to learn about new techniques or approaches, and be exposed to code you might otherwise not have an opportunity to browse. See also: Guidelines for submitters below. This requires the submitter to write a good description of the expected behavior, and why. The reviewer should make a genuine attempt to double-check that the goals of the PR appear to be satisfied by the code submitted.

New product behavior that may permanently alter performance characteristics moving forward.

Adopting new frameworks, libraries, or tools.

API changes (including JSON schema changes).

Database schema changes, like adding or removing columns and tables.

#Best code review tools for github software#

If youвЂ™re making significant architectural, schema, or build changes that will have long-term ramifications to the software or data, it is necessary to solicit a senior engineerвЂ™s acknowledgment and blessing.

Tests are also the ideal place to ensure that the changes have considered permissions and access control logic. Tests should avoid branching and looping as much as possible to prevent bugs in the test code from gaining a foothold.ДЇunctional tests that simulate how a user would call our APIs or use our UX are key to preventing regressions and avoiding brittle tests that are coupled to the internals of the products we ship. When reviewing tests double check that the tests cover the requirements of the project or that they cover the defect being fixed. At sentry we rely on our test suite to maintain a high quality bar and ship rapidly. There should be functional tests, integration tests or end-to-end tests covering the changes, if not ask for them.

If you are familiar with the project, do the changes conflict other requirements or goals? Could any of the methods being added be promoted to module level methods? Are methods being passed properties of objects when they could be passed the entire object? Tests Included When reviewing code, consider if the interactions of the various pieces in the change make sense together.

Missing or incorrect Permissions or Access Control.

Complex ORM interactions that may have unexpected query generation/performance.

API changes are not backwards compatible (e.g.

Code alters behavior elsewhere in an unanticipated way.

potential for an index to be out of bounds) Code Reviews are for вЂ¦ Identifying problematic codeДЄbove all, a code review should try to identify potential bugs that could cause the application to break вЂ“ either now, or in the future. Sentry has more than 200 public repositories, a more comprehensive list of teams and repositories can be found in the Sentry Structure overview.

вЂ“ the entire product team, use sparingly.

The following teams are defined in GitHub and can be used when creating Pull Requests: While GitHubвЂ™s tools arenвЂ™t always the best, they work well enough. By using GitHub features when possible, we make it easy for developers familiar with other projects on GitHub. Why Pull RequestsД«ecause Sentry is an open source project maintained via GitHub we want to ensure that the barrier to entry for external contributions is minimal. Additionally an appropriate team (or teams) for review.

When creating a pull request, reference any tickets or Sentry issues which are being addressed. Code review can have the important function of teaching engineers about the languages, frameworks and technologies we use in a collaborative environment that is about the changes being made. As you gain more experience and context on the products we build and technologies we use, you can provide valuable feedback to other engineers who may be working in areas that are new to them but familiar to you.Д¬ode review is an opportunity to improve your mentoring and communication skills. Who should be reviewing code?ДЄll engineers should be reviewing code. Templates may exist on repositories, if they do not, consider creating one. Finally, code review can identify several classes of problem before customers are exposed to them.Д¬ode review is managed via GitHubвЂ™s Pull Requests (see below for rationale). It is also an opportunity to collaborate with other teams. Code review helps build shared context and collective ownership. This adds overhead to each change, but ensures that simple, often overlooked problems are more easily avoided.